A few SaaS facts

In my travels the past weeks, I spent about 36 hours in Las Vegas at the Gartner Integration Summit.  I sat through a great SaaS presentation by Gartner analyst Ben Pring and wanted to share a few of my notes:

  • SaaS-based
    revenue growth = 22.1% CAGR thru 2011
  • The first
    wave of SaaS adoption was end-users, not IT
  • Next wave
    will need an end-user AND IT message
  • The era of
    the ship it on a CD, load it on a server enterprise software is over
  • ~65% of
    Siebel licenses never in production before Oracle acquisition
  • ~55% of
    Peoplesoft/Vantive licenses never in production before Oracle acquisition
  • 18% average
    server utilization rate in the enterprise (Yikes!)
  • $1:$10
    software to services ratio was good for the supply side(vendors) but not the
    demand side (customers)
  • Large
    enterprise software companies (Oracle, SAP) high gross margins are under threat
    from upstart, pure plays (Salesforce.com)
  • Gartner believes SaaS is primarily a software
    delivery and management approach that exists in an established market, such as
    CRM or ERP

The last point is perhaps the most interesting when looking at software as a service in the enterprise.  Salesforce didn’t have better features than Siebel, the just made it easier for end-users to access and use it.

I also sat through a great presentation on enterprise mashups by Anthony Bradley.  Here’s some audio of his preso.

Feeling the pain from email

Good write up on email and the massive drain it creates on productivity from the (now free content) Wall Street Journal.  The answer to this problem is not simple…and not readily at hand despite the efforts of companies like Xobni and ClearContextSeriosity, one of the other companies mentioned in the article, has a pretty unique approach to this – applying gaming concepts to email activity.  I spoke with Ken Ross some time ago while he was at the helm and thought the approach was interesting.  I signed up for Xobni’s beta some time ago and am anxiously awaiting my invite.  Once I get it, I’ll be sure to let you know my thoughts.

Gates lays down the entrepreneurial gauntlet

Looks like you better be on your toes if you are going to follow in Bill Gates’ footsteps.  From his recent remarks via the Seattle Times about those with aspirations of building a similar sized company today:

"…you’d better see something I don’t see if you want to start a company now."

Or…at least be nimble enough to get out ahead of him.  Microsoft, like Google, has a pile a cash and truck loads of bright people that can attack a market if it suits them.   The key is to complement, enhance, and/or extend product and platform strategies of companies like this.   

Or…if you are clever enough…see something they don’t.

 

Email IS the social network

This is an interesting story from NY Times Technology section.  It discusses how Google and Yahoo will be emphasizing email patterns to extract your "social graph" to compete in social networking.  I pointed out some time ago that email is the most meaningful and mature social network around because it is indicative of who you actually collaborate with on a day to day basis.  We’ll see how they bring it to life…

The art of the lead

As the one responsible for marketing in a start-up/early stage company, one thing matters more than anything else – lead & demand generation.  The following post is about selling to businesses but much of it can be applied to consumer markets as well.

There are lots of components that factor into this including proper value proposition definition, the right target market, and a pressing or easily elevated pain to address.  That last piece is the difference between lead generation and demand generation.  It takes longer and more effort (read investment) to generate demand versus merely tapping demand that already exists in the marketplace.  Getting the combination of things right is more art than science.  That said, there is a science to a properly run program.

The word "lead" is often used and just as often misused to describe a possible sales opportunity.  Reference the essential GlennGarry Glen Ross clip for insight.  It is important to understand that there is a process (sometimes long) from initial lead to a qualified and pursuit worthy sales prospect.  Just because someone "raises their hand" and downloads a whitepaper, watches a webcast, or registers for some information does not mean (other than rare circumstances) that they are immediately ready to buy something from you.  On top of that, doing it right means having your CUSTOMERS tell your story not just you.  Most companies have a maze of approval steps to go through to let their employees participate or speak on your behalf, but the investment is worth the payoff.  Even better is the "word of mouth" nirvana that results when one of your happy customers points someone your way without any marketing prompting (just a great focus on making customers happy).  This self-referencing customer set within a specific industry or domain is an indication that you have reached an inflection point of value in the life of your company.

Also, it is important to have a proper nurturing process to keep those that have expressed interest in the marketing process either through direct sales touch from time to time, a "drip" marketing program like a newsletter, or even better, being top of mind with their peers who also are your customers.  How you package this stuff for consumption is really important – focus on how people consume content in other parts of their lives.  Here’s a post on that.

So, what do you get for all this effort?  Even a great, well run program will yield only a 2-3% conversion to actual sale so there is definitely a quantitative approach to this.  Take your revenue targets, sales cycle, and average deal size then do the back math to determine how many "inquiries" you need to create to get to that number.  Plus or minus it will give you an indication of the challenge ahead.

Two of my favorite bloggers, Brad Feld and Paul Kedrosky, collectively weighed in on this some time ago (circa 2005).  Their perspective is consistent with what your investors want to know about marketing in a young company – do people care about what you are selling and are they converting into actual sales prospects.

Marketing is a lot of things but most importantly in a young company, it is about acquiring new customers.  The lead pipeline is the pre-sales pipeline and needs as much scrutiny and focus as the actual sales pipe. 

The worst actor..ever

Horatio460_2I’m not one to follow TV programs and haven’t actually been inside a movie theater in longer than I can remember.  That said, I endured an episode of CSI:Miami on one of the many channels that runs it in syndication and am convinced, beyond a doubt, that David Caruso is the worst actor….ever.  Beyond his fabulous career decision to leave NYPD Blue after it surged in popularity to perform such roles as the tough guy sidekick in "Proof of Life" and building on roles like a sheriff’s deputy in "First Blood", the ridiculous aloof/pouty/talk to you without looking at you/do you feel lucky punk thing is more than I can handle.  I actually became indignant during the show at the absolute comedy of the over-dramatization.  William Shatner has nothing on this guy.  Also, is everyone that works in the crime lab really that hip, sexy, metro-sexual type?  Maybe in Miami…