In2Lex Startup Advantage Conference & why you can build a company anywhere

In2Lex

I had the opportunity to attend and speak at the Startup Advantage Conference last week in Lexington, KY.

My good friend Jim Clifton was involved in organizing the event and asked me to speak along with some really amazing people like Micah Baldwin of Graphic.ly, Deal Architect Vinnie MirchandaniTim Schigel of ShareThis, Brian Wong of Kiip, and Rolf Skyberg of eBay among others.

I always enjoy my time in Lexington and am of the belief that you can start a company anywhere.  The ecosystem around you can definitely hurt or hinder your progress but in a world of high speed connections, web collaboration, and reduced distribution friction for software applications, location is not a disqualifier.

I met some great people and cool companies like Pheeva & Keepio including attending a pre-conference reception with Lexington Mayor Jim Gray.  We also had an amazing breakfast overlooking the Keeneland horse track as thoroughbreds had their morning workouts (a top 10 experience for me for sure).

Keeneland

The energy level was high and it was clear there was a focused effort to nurture and encourage entrepreneurship in this community.  I even capped off my visit with dinner at Le Deauville with the founder of Fark Drew Curtis and Rolf.

My presentation was later in the day so everyone was a bit tired (including me) but I focused on building a conversion funnel, ramping it up, and then what happens upon exit for a startup – "The End of the Beginning"

Big thanks to Randall Stevens and the rest of the crew in Lexington for including me and being leaders in their community focused on driving entrepreneurship and innovation.  I can't wait to return…

Markets Don’t Compile

Compile

In the small but noisy universe of technology startups, there has been a growing chorus of voices about the utility and value of marketing.  

This peaked over the last few days with Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures eviscerating the function and its practitioners followed by a similar post from Foundry Group's Brad Feld – Why a New Startup Shouldn't Have a Marketing Budget.  Fred went on to issue a 'bug report' on the first post with some amendments but of similar negative tone and smart folks like Rand Fishkin and Ben Casnocha weighed in with thoughtful counterpoints.  Also, be sure to read the comments across all these posts.  Lots of opinions from all sides.

I have enjoyed Fred's writing for many years and always respect his point of view including this post.  I have also worked with Brad and didn't notice him vomiting in his mouth in my presence although I must admit I wasn't specifically looking for it (to be clear: Brad is one of the best VC board members I have ever worked with and I am a huge fan).

But even before all of this, I had been thinking about it after reading Rebecca Lynn's post about why engineers make better marketers.

People, developers + designers do not equal a business.  Just ask the gnomes.

What I find most distracting about all of this is that it is devaluing the role one group of people play in a startup.  If marketing folks aren't worth the air they breathe, what about financial-types, HR folks, or even salespeople?

I am not trying to defend the marketing profession or those who profess expertise in it.  I disdain experts.  And yes, there is no shortage of morons that want to sell you marketing services or any other business or technical service for that matter.

I do believe this conversation needs to elevate a bit beyond job function to skill set.

The best and most effective marketers have an analytic approach – numbers, spreadsheets, metrics, etc. I have a degree in finance, an MBA, worked as a consultant for many years, and never sought a career path to become a Vice President of Marketing.  I was intellectually curious about the problems the products I was part of were trying to solve and managed to be somewhat good at explaining what it did and why you should care (product marketing).

I have written code.  Yes, it was many years ago and no it was not my life calling but I have done it.  And, more importantly, I respect the people that do it. It is a very, very different role in a startup compared to those who have to take what is developed to market, find the people who care about it, and extract payment.  

Writing code definitely requires brains but also delivers immediate feedback in a highly controlled environment – it compiles or it doesn't. If it doesn't work, debug it line by line until there are no more bugs.  Then figure out a way to improve it by doing it with less lines of code.  This is a focused activity where you are working to a definitive answer where no ambiguity remains.

Taking a product to market couldn't be more different..especially a new product. Create a hypothesis (these people will care), figure out a way to test it (ask them/create an offer), and measure the results.  

Oops, we were wrong.  Let's debug it and compile again. Oh wait, we can't.  Was it the wrong audience, the wrong message, was the offer not compelling, too many alternatives, not a big enough problem, missing features, wrong time, etc., etc?

Marketing in a startup is about two core things:

  1. Awareness – getting the word out so people will try your product and getting those same people to describe their own experiences with it.  These days it is definitely harder to keep someone's attention than to get it so new approaches and engagement models are essential.
  2. Distribution – how do you get more traffic, more download volume, more registrations, more referrals, etc?  Building it is only the first part, getting it into people's hands at scale is where you need to focus.

What is most ironic about Fred is that he is really, really good at what he clearly doesn't respect – marketing.  He has an audience, interacts with it often to promote what is important to him, and pushes his message to the market.  His post even lays out an eight step startup marketing plan.

So, let's stop with the marketing bashing, agree that an analytic approach is best, and understand that we are all trying to build great products and make them market successes.


Profiles in Arrogance

Great post on an article in Entrepreneur Magazine written by Brad Feld – A VC's Biggest Flaw:  Arrogance.  Brad is an entrepreneur turned venture capitalist and I appreciate the candor of the article. 

I have definitely met a few of these types of people over the years and have many friends and acquaintances that are VCs.  I tend to gravitate towards those not described below but have had my share of exposure to these types of folks as well. 

The investors you choose are as critical if not more so than the executive team around you.  The money is important but so is the man or woman behind it that will be with you every step of the way. 

Read the article and learn more about these VC personas (the descriptions are mine):

  1. Mr. 'Know-It-All':  need I say more?
  2. Young VC:  a freshly minted MBA with no experience or operating knowledge who has never made a cold call, asked for an order, or gotten an ear full from a customer about a buggy product.
  3. Experienced Entrepreneur:  can't keep their hands out of the operating details because that is where their passion and knowledge resides.

Venture capital provides fuel for innovation and entrepreneurship and I believe it is one of the foundational layers of our economy and society.  It not only has the appetite for risk but the stated purpose of taking on high levels of it for the chance of a high return and there are lots of exceptional people putting it to work everyday…and, like any industry, a few less so.

Hooray! Here comes a tech IPO

OpenTablestndLogo

Out of the storm of negativity comes a ray of sunshine.  OpenTable has filed and will be going public. It has been so long since a venture backed company has done this that you may have forgotten what this is all about. 

Essentially, a company with a business model and growth sells a part of its self to the public equity market (institutional and individual investors).  I didn't necessarily say profitable as OpenTable didn't quite make money on revenues of $41.3 million through September 2008.

Good to see this happening as well as a service that I have used and found value in over the years positioned to make the leap into the public markets.  If you've never used OpenTable to make a restaurant reservation, you should check it out.

Gary Snoman has been RIF’d

Sign of the times or fate that awaits all entrepreneurs turned venture capitalists turned masters of the universe?

Unfortunately, the folks at Blueprint Ventures decided to give Gary the boot and are not doing a Gary Snoman video this year.  This is actually too bad because this clever approach definitely got these guys some attention.

C’mon guys, where’s that Holiday spirit?

As a tribute to all that Gary has done for us over the last three years, here’s the one that got it all started in 2005 as well as 2006 when Gary becomes a VC:


What’s on the VC mind these days?

Here's a great video clip (via PEHub) put together to promote the AlwaysOn Venture Summit.  There is no shortage of pessimism and negativity related to the financial markets these days so the thoughts of this crew are especially interesting given that early stage investing is, after all, a game of optimism and belief in what "could be." 

There seemed to be consensus that the IPO market may return 2H09 but that is dependent on broader stabilization of the financial markets.  Also, here's the list I captured of what venture capitalists will be investing in:

  • Alternative energy and clean technology especially related to corporate IT
  • Communications especially mobile handset opportunities
  • Online gaming
  • Products/services that deliver value to end users (yes, a bit vague but could be my note taking)
  • Online ad efficiency
  • Electric cars

 

Does private equity offer superior returns?

Via PEHub, here's some data to sink your teeth into about the state of private capital.  As their post points out, slide 14 highlights some interesting return data.  Not sure an 8.8% 5 year return is much to brag about although the 10 year return number is a more respectable 16.6% for venture funds (9.5% for all private equity in the same time period…eck!).   Also, this data was as of 6/2008 before current market…um…volatility.

Exits are exceeding life of funds in many cases (ie, more than 10 years) which puts a whole new dynamic into venture funding and that was before the current market trauma.  The IPO market will return.  It's just a matter of when and until then the entire asset class is going to be under scrutiny from those that fund it.

A candid VC conversation

This is a good interview with Bob Ackerman of Allegis Capital by Robert Scoble.  I'm biased but I like the operating perspective in VCs.  If life takes me that direction at some point, I look forward to applying some of the lessons learned by living long sales cycles, struggling to come up with the right positioning, suffering through a destructive change of mind by a 'strategic partner' or putting a buggy product in the hands of the first customer. 

You don't get that perspective in an investment bank or through an HBS case study.  Who knows, maybe the pendulum swings back towards operating vets as Bob discusses here.  A bit long (30-ish minutes) but worth the time.

http://twistage.fastcompany.tv/plugins/player.swf?v=3aec989158ffd&p=scobleizer-tv_fctv_social

Another great Intel Capital portfolio company day

This time the folks at McGraw-Hill invited a handful of Intel's portfolio companies to New York City to brief their senior leadership on what we do and how we could help their various lines of business and initiatives.

I can't say enough about the great questions and interactivity the folks from McGraw-Hill demonstrated and really appreciate them inviting Hubspan to be part of the day.  I saw a few folks from the previous event I was part of in Orlando and learned about a few new cool companies like Mixercast, Workshare, & JackBe

It was also great to see fellow Seattle company Delve Networks there and I enjoyed meeting CEO Alex Castro. They take video and make it searchable.  With such a massive amount of video content floating around these days, relevance and the ability to quickly extract things meaningful to you is a major opportunity.

Interesting interview with Brad Burnham of Union Square Ventures

Some interesting points here including the desire to find "web meets world" businesses where a broad set of people use web-based applications as part of their daily lives versus an early adopter crew for sport or curiosity.  Not an earth shattering point but one to pay attention to coming from a group that has funded a lot of clever "web 2.0" applications in recent years.

http://blip.tv/play/AciTa4ecGQ