Free vs. Paid

I was asked this question today via email so thought I would share my response here.  Many times you think “free” will resolve adoption/traction issues.  Most times, it will not…

=====

Free users are just that – free. They never expect to pay, have to be acquired in much the same way as paying customers, and they will demand the level of support and experience of paid users. “Maybe” you nail a freemium model and get 3-5% to convert to pay.  Freemium models require big balance sheets ($) to support and big numbers of users to pencil that conversion rate.

I am a bigger fan of getting to revenue – and use that as an indication of traction. Simply dropping or removing the price does not remove the adoption cycle or sales friction to get this into the hands of your target customers.  You will get to a point where you need larger deals so starting at $0 makes that a long climb.  Take your lumps in the sales cycle…

That said, given your stage as a company, you could get a away with a ‘beta’ program. Lets you get early product into the hands of targets, build those relationships, build a fan base, polish your sales and support operations then “launch” a commercial version priced appropriately. You could always grandfather those beta users in some way (first year 50% discount with an annual contract or whatever)

All of the above is my opinion and you should get others. 

I put more weight on 3-5 unaffiliated (not buddy deals) customers that have chosen to take money from their pocket and give it to you vs. a user count.  

If you choose the user path, then get dialed in and optimize around daily active use/users – that will be one of the key metrics a user driven investor will look for – how often is the product used, what is churn/dormancy, what does growth from that user to other users look like. All of that will have to be optimized in the product experience so that you don’t burn all your cash white gloving folks who don’t pay you.

Today is my last day at Gist

Gist_logo
This has been part of the plan following the company's acquisition by Research In Motion back in February.

It is the end of what has been a fun, crazy, and rewarding few years.  I first sat down with founder T.A. McCann in mid-2008 to catch up and got the download on what was at the time called Mineboxx.  The company evolved to Gist, I began to consult on go-to-market stuff, and joined as full-time Vice President of Marketing following closing a Series A venture capital round in May of 2009.

There are lots of nuggets of wisdom gained during this time that I'll share more about going forward and can't say enough great things about my team and all involved. 

So, what's next for me?

I am enjoying "being generous" and helping companies think about how they are building their sales pipelines, developing their customer acquisition funnels, and going to market.  It's nice to share what worked as well as a few lumps from failure with the desire to accelerate their success and advance my understanding of what is possible.

Included in that is being a Mentor at TechStars/Seattle for the first time this year.  That program is just getting started and I look forward to working with the companies there as well as getting to know many of the other mentors I have yet to meet.

I'll also be working more formally as an advisor to LoopFuse.  They are an Atlanta-based marketing automation software company focusing on the SMB market with web analytics, lead nurturing/scoring, and email marketing all in one package.  I encourage every startup out there (every company, actually) to put a nurture program in place and with LoopFuse you can start and use it for free paying only when you begin to scale (a good deal!)

Other activities include living vicariously through my friend Joe Solomon and his Steamboat Springs, CO-based adventure travel company Iconic Adventures where I am helping a bit on the marketing front.

I have my eye on a few opportunities that include starting my own company.  I have worked in startups for the past ten years and am now at a place where doing something of my own makes sense.  What is it?  More details as the pieces come together but I am looking at sales & marketing processes, the inefficiencies that exist there, and how social, mobile, etc. technologies can be used to "hack" it. 

I'll also be enjoying a bit more time with my wonderful (and understanding) wife, amazing daughters, and loving but neurotic dog. Oh, and trying to catch up on training for the Portland Marathon on October 9th (my first full marathon) that Marel & I will be running together.

So, email me if you want to chat, have an idea, or are looking for a bit of advice on marketing and markets.  I'm happy to connect…

Our healthcare system continues to fail entrepreneurs

Regardless of your opinion on the recent healthcare reform debate, process, and resulting legislation, one would expect the output of so much brain power and political capital to truly improve things.

I am not a policy wonk, healthcare expert, and have not read the Obamacare bill in its entirety (like most members of Congress) but this story about Sarah Perez leaving ReadWriteWeb due to the lack of affordable healthcare coverage makes my blood boil.

Sarah is awesome, a great journalist, and was very kind to us as we created and launched Gist.  She is leaving ReadWriteWeb because of a growing family and the lack of employer provided healthcare.  This quote alone lays it out in black and white for me:

Now my husband runs his own business, and we pay for our own health care. It’s expensive, and it’s a struggle. 

So I’m moving on, to somewhere that can offer me the benefits of a larger organization.

This makes my blood boil because a great person is leaving the "best job she ever had" due to the costs of healthcare as she and her husband both pursue entrepreneurial endeavors.

How does this make sense? Why wasn't this obvious obstacle to entrepreneurship addressed in the healthcare reform debate?  We sorely need jobs and economic growth in this country and it breaks my heart that this situation continues to exist.  There are many, many talented and smart entrepreneurs staying in corporate jobs or needing to return to one because of the costs of self-insuring.

Sarah – I will miss you and your readers will miss you.  Thank you for sharing your story..and for inspiring me to write this post.

Awesome time today at TechStars for a Day – Seattle [Slides]

I had a great time speaking today at a TechStars event here in Seattle.  Big thanks to Andy Sack and Kayla Roark for organizing and to Perkins Coie for the 48th floor conference room on a (finally) sunny day here.  I met lots of smart and energetic entrepreneurs, heard lots of pitches, and tried to add a bit of value along the way.  My presentation was about "getting started" which is arguably the hardest part of starting a company – just starting.

I am really looking forward to being a TechStars mentor to this year's class and seeing these great people be successful.  Here are my slides (also big thanks to the Slideshare folks for featuring this deck today on their site!):


 

Funnel Dynamics – Towards the $1 Cost of Acquisition [Slides]

I have been working to summarize and consolidate the experiences I had building the user acquisition funnel at Gist with a specific focus on programs, tactics, and actual costs. My goal (not reached) was to drive the cost of acquisition down to $1 per user – something unheard of in traditional lead/demand generation circles and aggressive even in a web-application world.

The deck below is sort of a version one and not necessarily optimized for visual appeal so apologies for being a bit text heavy.  It is pretty meaty and I have shared it with a few folks in one-on-one sessions so wanted to share this version broadly.  Enjoy!

In2Lex Startup Advantage Conference & why you can build a company anywhere

In2Lex

I had the opportunity to attend and speak at the Startup Advantage Conference last week in Lexington, KY.

My good friend Jim Clifton was involved in organizing the event and asked me to speak along with some really amazing people like Micah Baldwin of Graphic.ly, Deal Architect Vinnie MirchandaniTim Schigel of ShareThis, Brian Wong of Kiip, and Rolf Skyberg of eBay among others.

I always enjoy my time in Lexington and am of the belief that you can start a company anywhere.  The ecosystem around you can definitely hurt or hinder your progress but in a world of high speed connections, web collaboration, and reduced distribution friction for software applications, location is not a disqualifier.

I met some great people and cool companies like Pheeva & Keepio including attending a pre-conference reception with Lexington Mayor Jim Gray.  We also had an amazing breakfast overlooking the Keeneland horse track as thoroughbreds had their morning workouts (a top 10 experience for me for sure).

Keeneland

The energy level was high and it was clear there was a focused effort to nurture and encourage entrepreneurship in this community.  I even capped off my visit with dinner at Le Deauville with the founder of Fark Drew Curtis and Rolf.

My presentation was later in the day so everyone was a bit tired (including me) but I focused on building a conversion funnel, ramping it up, and then what happens upon exit for a startup – "The End of the Beginning"

Big thanks to Randall Stevens and the rest of the crew in Lexington for including me and being leaders in their community focused on driving entrepreneurship and innovation.  I can't wait to return…

Product = Experience

Experience

This is a follow up to my Sales = Support post about how the delivery and consumption of web-based products is changing the way we need to think about aligning around the end-user.

Like many of my blog posts, this was inspired by a conversation (an email exchange in this case) about whether to focus on adding features or focus on the user experience given limited resources.

I had been meaning to write this for some time so decided to post here what I shared with a friend:

Do one thing and make it really simple (to start).  There are always features to add and complexity to consider but people use products and unless they have to use it (do x to get paid/keep your job, etc.) they choose to use products based on value delivered.  

I definitely believe that product = experience in an on-demand world.  You want people to find, try, use and love your thing with limited to no involvement on your part.  This makes it all about experience. You get involved when they have a question or observation:  sales = support.  The product = experience blog post is coming soon:)

That said, if you are not quite to the point where the one thing you are doing really well doesn't solve someone's problem yet, then focus on that.

Consider a product like Dropbox.  They get a lot of buzz but one of the things that stands out to me is not their fame but how dead simple the product is to use and works itself into my existing knowledge. I didn't have to learn how to use it, it works like a file finder/manager – looks the same, even integrated into that view.  

They are not the first (or last) company to do cloud-based file backup but they made it work for me with limited brain cycles to learn it.  Most people are not curious enough to figure it out so the focus has to be on quick time to value.

 

Markets Don’t Compile

Compile

In the small but noisy universe of technology startups, there has been a growing chorus of voices about the utility and value of marketing.  

This peaked over the last few days with Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures eviscerating the function and its practitioners followed by a similar post from Foundry Group's Brad Feld – Why a New Startup Shouldn't Have a Marketing Budget.  Fred went on to issue a 'bug report' on the first post with some amendments but of similar negative tone and smart folks like Rand Fishkin and Ben Casnocha weighed in with thoughtful counterpoints.  Also, be sure to read the comments across all these posts.  Lots of opinions from all sides.

I have enjoyed Fred's writing for many years and always respect his point of view including this post.  I have also worked with Brad and didn't notice him vomiting in his mouth in my presence although I must admit I wasn't specifically looking for it (to be clear: Brad is one of the best VC board members I have ever worked with and I am a huge fan).

But even before all of this, I had been thinking about it after reading Rebecca Lynn's post about why engineers make better marketers.

People, developers + designers do not equal a business.  Just ask the gnomes.

What I find most distracting about all of this is that it is devaluing the role one group of people play in a startup.  If marketing folks aren't worth the air they breathe, what about financial-types, HR folks, or even salespeople?

I am not trying to defend the marketing profession or those who profess expertise in it.  I disdain experts.  And yes, there is no shortage of morons that want to sell you marketing services or any other business or technical service for that matter.

I do believe this conversation needs to elevate a bit beyond job function to skill set.

The best and most effective marketers have an analytic approach – numbers, spreadsheets, metrics, etc. I have a degree in finance, an MBA, worked as a consultant for many years, and never sought a career path to become a Vice President of Marketing.  I was intellectually curious about the problems the products I was part of were trying to solve and managed to be somewhat good at explaining what it did and why you should care (product marketing).

I have written code.  Yes, it was many years ago and no it was not my life calling but I have done it.  And, more importantly, I respect the people that do it. It is a very, very different role in a startup compared to those who have to take what is developed to market, find the people who care about it, and extract payment.  

Writing code definitely requires brains but also delivers immediate feedback in a highly controlled environment – it compiles or it doesn't. If it doesn't work, debug it line by line until there are no more bugs.  Then figure out a way to improve it by doing it with less lines of code.  This is a focused activity where you are working to a definitive answer where no ambiguity remains.

Taking a product to market couldn't be more different..especially a new product. Create a hypothesis (these people will care), figure out a way to test it (ask them/create an offer), and measure the results.  

Oops, we were wrong.  Let's debug it and compile again. Oh wait, we can't.  Was it the wrong audience, the wrong message, was the offer not compelling, too many alternatives, not a big enough problem, missing features, wrong time, etc., etc?

Marketing in a startup is about two core things:

  1. Awareness – getting the word out so people will try your product and getting those same people to describe their own experiences with it.  These days it is definitely harder to keep someone's attention than to get it so new approaches and engagement models are essential.
  2. Distribution – how do you get more traffic, more download volume, more registrations, more referrals, etc?  Building it is only the first part, getting it into people's hands at scale is where you need to focus.

What is most ironic about Fred is that he is really, really good at what he clearly doesn't respect – marketing.  He has an audience, interacts with it often to promote what is important to him, and pushes his message to the market.  His post even lays out an eight step startup marketing plan.

So, let's stop with the marketing bashing, agree that an analytic approach is best, and understand that we are all trying to build great products and make them market successes.


Gist Acquired by Research In Motion (RIM)

  RIM_black
I am very pleased to share that Gist, where I have been working for the past 2+ years, has been acquired by Research In Motion – the folks who make the BlackBerry.

Here is the Gist blog post about it and here is the post on the Inside BlackBerry blog.

This is a great outcome for everyone and we are all very excited about joining RIM and charting out a path forward.  I have spent many years working in the space where messaging meets people meets the enterprise and am very excited about what lies ahead.

I still remember my first BlackBerry device. Anybody remember this beauty – the 950?

BlackBerry950
It was the one about the size of a fist that looked more like a pager than the smartphones of today.  Here is a great historical view of the evolution of their device dating back a whopping 10 years.

Thanks to all who have helped and supported me over the past couple years!