When cool collides

I got to thinking about this today after reading a few articles about Google celebrating its 10th anniversary and now, apparently, getting into the crosshairs of both the anti-trust and privacy hawks.  Microsoft and IBM have long been considered the big tech companies that everybody loved to hate even though their products continue to find a market and their revenues continue to climb.

So what happens when the antithesis to Microsoft comes of age and becomes one of these big companies?

Google has done some growing up, is experiencing a decline/pause in its massive stock appreciation, and is desperately trying to be more than an advertising company.  I can't find the source (apologies) but remember reading a quote about Google that goes something like this:  "it is a company of mad scientists supported by an advertising business."  Great for now, but what happens when an earnings miss occurs, a downturn in ad spending happens, or margins begin to erode?

The other "cool" player on the landscape is Apple and has held the title of "not IBM/Microsoft" for some time driven home by its really clever Mac vs PC commercials.  Their resurgence as a company has been very exciting to watch which makes me wonder what's next to sustain this growth?  Look around next time you are in a coffee shop or board meeting and count the number of Macs you see.  It is no longer the unique/alternative choice it once was.

It will be interesting to watch as the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" approach begins to wane and these two cool companies collide as tech industry giants.

I use products and services from all these companies and like the fact that they continue to raise the bar with each other.  I believe this drives innovation, creates opportunities for start ups, and creates a near-term exit path for venture-backed companies while the IPO market continues to be flat. 

Evolving from scrappy start up set on dethroning the big guy to large global multi-billion dollar player is what happens when you become successful beyond imagination.  It is part of the natural evolution and motivates a whole new generation of young companies to come after you.

A done deal

Wow.  Seems to be official that the US gov will be bailing out Freddie and Fannie. 

Bail

From a look at the markets in Asia, the world still likes a US government guarantee.  A bit of a counterpoint to those naysayers about the credibility of the US these days….

I'm still not sure if it is a good or bad thing but unlike most of the pundits, I will give some credit to those in the positions to make these decisions and believe that this was the right thing.  Why?  I'm not sure I totally grasp all of the angles although after reading Bob Rubin's book In an Uncertain World and getting a harsh crash course in economics about the true threat the Asian currency meltdown posed, I found a new respect for those in the #1 seat at Treasury and like the fact that it is a Rubin contemporary at the helm.

Factoring business school applications into the economic forecast

Remember my post about Harvard Business School grads' career choices as an economic indicator?  Well, this story from Businessweek (via Dealbreaker) points to an even more interesting one in terms of the level of B-school applications with some schools seeing double digit growth.  Does the increase in applicants signal a capitulation of type-A knowledge worker types or that we are indeed swinging towards a bottom of the economic cycle?  Your guess is as good as mine but it is worth noting. 

A “Dublin Lawyer”

Food posts have proven to be very popular on this blog with my post on cedar plank salmon consistently ranking at the top of the search engine hits I get.  So I thought I would build on that and share what I whipped up a week or so ago at the request of my pregnant wife (yes, we are expecting).

During my trip to Connecticut, I had one of the best lobster rolls I have ever had at Lenny & Joe's.  After sharing this experience with Marel (who was not there), "lobster equity" had to be achieved when I got home.  While digging for recipes, I remembered a great meal many years ago of lobster sauteed in Irish whiskey and served in the shell.  I did not know this at the time, but I was having a "Dublin Lawyer."

It is very simple – lobster, butter, Irish whiskey, and a bit of cream.  Also, it is always fun to light what you are cooking on fire.

DSCF0003

Transparency

I am a huge advocate of transparency both across functional areas as well as within my team and try to share everything I possibly can as soon as I can.  Sharing information vs. hoarding it is a key foundation of leadership and indicative of someone's comfort in their role and position.

I have read a handful of John Maxwell's books on leadership including The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership and agree that part of a leader's job is to replace themselves by providing those they lead with opportunity.  If you can do my job, then I am able to go and do another job.  This is not intuitive to most folks.

There are, of course, some things that must not be widely shared but calling out in advance that the goal is to share any and all information is key to effective leadership. 

It is, however, important to consider if all members of your team are ready for this type of transparency and can handle the information you are sharing.  Part of it is how it is packaged and presented although I have learned the hard way that this policy can cause angst and, in some cases, departures.  So be it as you want to surround yourself with those that are up for a challenge and will do whatever it takes to succeed.

It’s not about the browser

Much banter today about Google's entry into the browser wars with "Chrome."  This piece from Henry Blodget and this video clip on TechTicker put it into proper perspective. 

This is not about a new browser with clever features.  It is about an all out assault on operating systems like Windows or as Blodget points out "an operating system for cloud computing."  Looks like the download link is live – get it here.

A SaaS contrarian taken to task

The smart folks over at Appirio have posted a direct and pointed response to Harry Debes' comments about SaaS being a passing fad as my previous post highlighted.  One of my favorite parts:

"When the sunk costs have been fully depreciated, customers effectively run the software for free." Yeah,
right. This is a shocking lie – unless Debes and on-premise software
companies want to stop collecting maintenance payments from customers.
Tell on-premise customers who have
had their maintenance fees raised without warning,
or had a running product suddenly characterized as "end of life"
because their vendor was hungry for an upgrade, that they're running
software for "free." The even greater cost is the lack of business
flexibility these rigid systems empart on their customers.

Read the whole thing.