Switching gears a bit

As many of you already know, I have transitioned into a consulting role at Hubspan and will gradually be phasing out my involvement over the next several months.  I joined up over a year ago to rebuild go-to-market efforts and have done some great things during that time including increasing the level of market awareness, getting recognition by leading analysts, emphasizing the SaaS attributes of the integration technology,  and getting the ball rolling on several key strategic partnerships.

As with any company, the right people are defined by the lifecycle and strategy of that company so I am moving on.  My interests reside elsewhere and I have several cool things going on that I will share more about going forward.  In the meantime, I am doing a bit of consulting so let me know if you have any needs or just want to connect to discuss something you've read here – robertcpease at gmail dot com.

What a press release is…and isn’t

When I left management consulting and joined my first start up, one of the most memorable experiences was the launch of that company and the associated effort that went into preparing the "press release." 

It was ridiculous – wordsmithing, a dozen iterations, everyone with an opinion but only a few with a clue, concern and finger pointing because no one picked it up when it was released, etc.

I thought it a function of the time and people involved but as I have progressed through the product ranks to lead Marketing departments, I see it play out all the time…and, quite frankly, I have become less and less tolerant of it.

Why it happens?

  • Marketing messaging not tight or agreed to – if you haven't agreed to what words to use and not use, this is not the time for it.
  • Everyone fancies themselves an editor but not a writer – lots of opinions and not everyone is entitled to one. 
  • Lack of understanding of the process and/or role of a press release in a broader marketing effort – it is important, but not that important.
  • A bad PR firm – if they are not process driven, you are hosed.
  • General arrogance – if you or your exec team believe you know better, be prepared to be disappointed.

The standard formula is to have something worthy of saying, put a pithy quote in from an executive, and a third party like an analyst or, more importantly, a customer.  Here are a few types of press releases and my opinion on each:

  • Company launch – no one cares externally but an important symbolic step in the lifecycle of a company.  Better with a customer reference.
  • Product announcement – no one cares unless a customer is quoted about using it but also an important symbolic step for those on the dev team that killed themselves to get it done.
  • Partnership announcement – no one really cares unless it is significant meaning a reseller/OEM type relationship.  Marketing relationships add logos but if you have a story about who you are doing this for together (a customer) it is huge.
  • Customer announcement – these are, hands down, the best ones you can do
  • Research/survey announcement – good for establishing thought leadership and reinforcing your expertise in the market.  Also provide great content for your PR firm to pitch stories around.
  • Executive/board appointment – no one cares unless it is a new CEO and then make sure it is a good reason there is a new one.
  • Funding announcement – no one really cares but if it is a new company it is a stamp of credibility.  If the company has been around a while it lets people figure out your valuation and hurdle for exit.
  • Business results announcement – no one really cares unless you are shopping yourself as private companies don't report results.  Will get your competitors' attention which can be both good and bad.
  • Awards/certifications – important as they demonstrate 3rd party validation and credibility
  • Analyst coverage – very important if it is magic quadrant or wave placement, unfortunately

Remember, your press release matters more to you than anyone else and it's what you do with it once it is out there that matters.  Articles, interviews, mentions, re-posting, etc. are what you are looking for and the longer the tail the better. 

Also, there still is a role for a press release in a world full of blogs.  Issue the release and use the blog to drive the conversation about it.

People respond to what you inspect

I heard this in a presentation some time ago and believe it was credited to Louis Gerstner of IBM fame.  I think it is a great quote and one worthy of remembering. 

Regardless of your job or role, what you measure and how you hold those accountable to what you measure will influence their behavior.  The important thing to do is to make sure the metrics and measures you are using are the right ones.  Number of calls made, site traffic, expenses, time in the office, leads generated, proposals sent, amount of time to follow up on a lead, etc. will influence how people work and what they prioritize. 

Be sure to inspect but make sure you inspect the right things.

A professional due diligence checklist for considering a new job

As there are increasingly more than a few folks between opportunities these days, I thought I would put forth some thoughts on how to evaluate a job opportunity with sort of a "due diligence" check list. 

Scoring high or low on the criteria below is not necessarily good or bad, but will help clarify the true nature of the opportunity in front of you.  Also, this definitely has a technology/early stage bias but can be abstracted to other industries and company stages.

  • Defined market – Target buyer(s) defined, validated, and the way(s) to reach them known and proven?
  • Defined product – Aligned with the strategic landscape and market needs?  Are different customers on different code bases?
  • Defined pain or process with proper domain expertise – Known "problems solved" with sufficient resources on staff with credible domain expertise in the problem space?
  • Defined sales path – Existence of a predictable, repeatable, and dependable process for finding, engaging, and closing customers?
  • Stable team in proper geographic concentration for stage of business – High caliber, intellectually invested, long serving team?  If any of the above bullets are lacking, all execs should be in the same office.
  • A track record of success – Reference previous post on turnaround vs. growth opportunities.
  • Strong, referencable customer base – Strong business relationships in addition to service/support.  Is the company viewed as an adviser as well as a vendor?
  • Mentorship/professional development – Emphasis on setting people up for success, respect for each team member and a strong meritocracy?
  • Authority & ownership – Amount of leeway and decision making granted about spending, hiring, external communications, etc.
  • Financial stability/committed funding – Cash in the bank, burn rate, milestone-based additional funding vs. committed, existing timeline for exit/sale?

Thoughts on channel marketing

Going to market through someone else can be both very lucrative and very complex at the same time.  As you are shifting responsibility for your market success to a 3rd party, marketing must focus on enabling the partner to sell the solution which includes both educating the partner sales force as well as conditioning the market to receive the offering through market awareness efforts.

I believe channel marketing requires a "services orientation" and has a heavy emphasis on enabling a partner, their partners, and the respective sales teams.  Here are some considerations:

Marketing Programs Guiding Principles

  • Easy to execute
  • Focus on differentiation
  • Make repeatable across partners
  • Drive awareness, create leads, yield revenue

Focus on delivery and executing

  • Use a standard Bill of Materials (BOM) for channel sales enablement that is email distributed, a physical versioned CD, and/or web hosted (partner internal and company partner portal)

Marketing Services

  • Telemarketing/prospecting
  • Web presence
  • Newsletter & nurture programs
  • On-line/print promotion
  • Case studies
  • Research & thought leadership

Marketing Training/Education

  • Workshop (partner site)
  • Webcast (virtual)
  • Certification program

Marketing Communications

  • Monthly/Qtrly Channel newsletter (partner specific) which includes news, upcoming events, promotions, case studies, product updates to their sales, mkting, ops, support, client services – anyone on the contact list for that partner
  • A web-based partner portal that includes sales tools, marketing collateral, partner handbook

Harry Reid needs to be reminded who his customer is

This popped up in several places around the opening of a new visitor center for the US Capitol.  Like most government projects it is over budget, controversial, blah, blah, blah.  That bothers me, but this statement by Senate Majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada really gets me:

"My staff tells me not to say this, but I'm going to say it anyway,"
said Reid in his remarks. "In the summer because of the heat and high
humidity, you could literally smell the tourists coming into the
Capitol. It may be descriptive but it's true."

Harry – when your "staff" tells you not to do something, don't do it.  These smelly tourists pay your salary and, odds are, a few vote for you.  This is not the "change" that we are looking for and even more evidence that those elected to serve need to rotate in and out of the real world a bit more.

Somebody show this guy the door…

What’s on the VC mind these days?

Here's a great video clip (via PEHub) put together to promote the AlwaysOn Venture Summit.  There is no shortage of pessimism and negativity related to the financial markets these days so the thoughts of this crew are especially interesting given that early stage investing is, after all, a game of optimism and belief in what "could be." 

There seemed to be consensus that the IPO market may return 2H09 but that is dependent on broader stabilization of the financial markets.  Also, here's the list I captured of what venture capitalists will be investing in:

  • Alternative energy and clean technology especially related to corporate IT
  • Communications especially mobile handset opportunities
  • Online gaming
  • Products/services that deliver value to end users (yes, a bit vague but could be my note taking)
  • Online ad efficiency
  • Electric cars

 

A framework for understanding personal messaging

I have been thinking through this a bit and am trying to get my head around all the ways we connect and share information (person to person).  As blogging is not only a great way to share but a way for me to sort my thoughts on topics, I thought a post would force my thinking a bit.

At this point, I have identified 10 different categories for personal messaging:

1. Email

  • Corporate (Exchange/Domino environments)
  • Webmail (free services like Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo! mail)
  • 'Site mail' (closed network email like Facebook or LinkedIn mail)
  • Email services (outbound where you can assign a "From" like email marketing systems)

2. Text messaging

  • From a device
  • From a browser
  • From a system

3. Instant messaging

  • Stand alone apps like AIM or Trillian
  • Inside webmail like Gmail
  • Site IM (like Facebook)

4.  Content sharing/distribution (Slideshare, Youtube, etc.)
5.  Blogs (includes web pages, RSS feeds, and comments)
6.  Wikis and other collaborative spaces (closed/invitation only)
7.  Micro-blogging (Twitter including its direct message capabilities)
8.  Voice (includes POTS, VOIP, and cellular)
9.  Video (new like Gmail feature)
10. Other social networking tools/sites (a laundry list of options here including Facebook, MySpace, etc.)

I'll follow up with a post around the twelve or so factors to consider when selecting one method over the other.

Does private equity offer superior returns?

Via PEHub, here's some data to sink your teeth into about the state of private capital.  As their post points out, slide 14 highlights some interesting return data.  Not sure an 8.8% 5 year return is much to brag about although the 10 year return number is a more respectable 16.6% for venture funds (9.5% for all private equity in the same time period…eck!).   Also, this data was as of 6/2008 before current market…um…volatility.

Exits are exceeding life of funds in many cases (ie, more than 10 years) which puts a whole new dynamic into venture funding and that was before the current market trauma.  The IPO market will return.  It's just a matter of when and until then the entire asset class is going to be under scrutiny from those that fund it.