I had a really nice trip to Minneapolis this week (minus the rain) and wanted to share the presentation I jointly gave at the Inside Sales Professionals summit along with Matt Heinz of Heinz Marketing. Matt is a friend and sales/marketing expert that runs a consulting firm here in Seattle. Here are the slides and let me know if you have any questions or feedback on them:
Author: Robert Pease
Headed to the Inside Sales Leadership Summit in Minneapolis
I am on my way to Minneapolis where I will be giving a presentation around the bottom line results that can be derived from using social media in the sales process. I'll be co-presenting with Matt Heinz of Heinz Marketing and am looking forward to showing off how to use Gist as a sales tool at the event.
If you are going or are in Minneapolis and want to connect, let me know robertcpease at gmail dot com.
I'll post summary thoughts and key takeaways as well.
Re: Want mentorship and investment for your startup?
Andy Sack asked for help spreading the word about TechStars here in Seattle so I thought I'd post his request here. Andy is leading the charge on the first season of TechStars locally, is the ring leader behind Seattle Open Coffee, and is a great guy.
If you are itching to start a tech company in Seattle, definitely apply to TechStars….
From Andy:
TechStars is a mentorship-driven seed stage investment
program. It is now accepting applications for the inaugural
2010 Seattle class. Applications are due by June 1, 2010 and the
program kicks-off on August 16, 2010. The Seattle program is funded by
every major venture capital firm in Seattle. We are reaching out to every
organization in Seattle that works with entrepreneurs to help spread
the word about
the program. There is more information about TechStars online, www.techstars.org. Any help you can provide in
promoting the program or encouraging exciting young companies and
engineers to apply is greatly appreciated.
Startup metrics and other nuggets of wisdom from Steve Blank
I have professed my admiration for Steve Blank numerous times on this blog and continue to give a copy of The Four Steps to the Epiphany to everyone who joins my team as well as make use of many pieces of his customer development methodology.
Video embed doesn't seem to work so here is the link to it.
This is a great video of Steve's presentation at the recent Startup Lessons Learned Conference in San Francisco. It is about 40 minutes of your time but is a nicely done breakout of the differences among a startup, a venture-backed startup, and a large company including they measures of success and right people at various stages.
Lots of good nuggets in here but really liked the description of startup metrics:
- Customer acquisition cost
- Viral coefficient
- Customer lifetime value
- Average selling price/order size
- Monthly burn rate
The discussion around GM's history is also well done painting a picture between entrepreneurs and operating management. Here are the slides as well:
Lasting impressions from TEDx Seattle
I was fortunate to have the opportunity to attend TEDx Seattle yesterday. If you are not familiar with TED and its purpose, I highly recommend you check it out and watch some of the previous presentations. They promote "Riveting talks by remarkable people, free to the world." The "TEDx" events are local, independently produced events that follow the format and flow of the main event held annually which is definitely on my list to attend at some point.
Essentially, TED is about spreading ideas and providing a forum for sharing information and broadening perspective.
There were lots of great speakers and thought provoking presentations yesterday. I kept my computer closed and phone off during all the sessions choosing to go old school and actually write down a few notes during the presentations. Here are a few of the things that made the most impact on me:
- Storytelling is an essential part of communicating and sharing diverse experiences.
- Mobile technologies are about more than making us more productive, they can directly impact the health, agriculture, and economic development of nations (I have previously written on this here and here).
- Mobile technologies can both improve the delivery of health care in developing countries as well as serve as data collection devices in and of themselves (for vital signs, etc.) creating the ability to capture, transmit, and compare data over time and among populations. This helps bridge the gap in countries where there is one doctor for every x thousands or tens of thousands of people.
- The transparency provided by social technologies brings up questions like if we know everything about everybody, will we even care any more or what is the true impact of having everything we have ever done documented to be used by us or against us?
- Something as simple as access to a savings account can make a huge impact on helping people escape poverty. Less than half of the people in the world have a bank account.
- Our interconnected and information rich world has created "information poverty" for those without the means to access it.
One of the more meaningful sessions (to me) was Eugene Cho's presentation about One Day's Wages. Truly inspirational and something I plan on learning more about.
Also, be sure to read Todd Bishop's nicely written summary of the day and you can get a feel for it 140 characters at a time via the Twitter chatter here.
I believe it is important
to hear speakers present on things outside of your daily tasks, lives,
and subject matter expertise. I use to be better at finding the time
and venues to learn about new things and have made a commitment to
better prioritize this in my life.
My presentation to the TAG Enterprise 2.0 Society this week in Atlanta
I had a nice visit to Atlanta where I had the opportunity to make a presentation to the Enterprise 2.0 Society of the Technology Association of Georgia (TAG). It was a great group and I am impressed with how TAG, Georgia Tech, and the ATDC continue to drive innovation. The Centergy facility in downtown Atlanta is especially impressive.
The focus of my discussion was on using social media in the sales process and specific measurable results that can be realized from using these tools. Slides below but my main points were:
- IT “Personalization” is blurring the professional/personal divide
- Social media efforts must move beyond listening to effective engagement to see the greatest benefit
- Social media can drive revenue but sales is still a process
- Inboxes proliferate and are becoming more social
- Available information is overwhelming and effective filtering is essential
Three years
Today marks the third anniversary of this blog. Thank you to all who routinely read what I share as well as to those who drop by every once in a while and hopefully get some value out of my ramblings.
I have made 660 posts over the past three years, met some new people, and created a nice bit of content about life, marketing, startups, and the occasional but very popular recipe (who knew?) along the way.
I blog to understand, share, and communicate. It has been one of the more rewarding things I have ever done and look forward to continuing it for many, many years.
How to assess a market opportunity
Being stuck inside on a rainy Sunday in Seattle, I thought I would share a post about how to use a framework/structured approach to assess a market opportunity.
This is primarily for a new venture but most of this can be applied to analyzing an existing business or launching a new product/service from an established company.
First, some baseline questions to answer:
- What market are you talking about? Define it in broad but measurable terms.
- Who is the customer? End-user, distribution partner, someone else? Detail the persona including name, role, etc. Even better if you know one or many of these people (so you can talk to them)
- What challenges do you face as a new entrant lacking a track record? What are the barriers to entry? Can you disrupt existing consumption/distribution models or are you dependent on a few partners to be successful?
Next, dig into the market opportunity:
1. Validate the market
- Market definition – per above but dig into the specific category and sub-category you are targeting.
- Target segments including both vertical industries and functional roles.
- Buyer profile(s) – not only who says 'yes' but who pays…and who can say "no."
- Needs vs. wants – are you addressing a pain or are you a nice to have? Elevating a want to a need or surfacing a yet to be realized pain takes considerable effort and resources.
- Structured '5 Forces' analysis including power of customers, intensity of competitors, power of suppliers/partners, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitutes.
Deliverable: Summarized data covering market size, segment definitions, and needs analysis. Also include background/learning conversations with thought leaders/influencers (analysts, bloggers, etc.) as well as results of discussions with assumed customers and friendly observers.
2. State of the market
- What does the adoption curve look like? Are you selling to early adopters or pragmatists?
- Will it be a long or short sales cycle? What are the barriers to yes?
- Strength/unique selling proposition of incumbents as well as challenges faced by a new entrant.
Deliverable: Analysis of most attractive markets, competitors, and customer traction/uptake potential.
3. Capabilities
- What is the offering and how will you deliver (distribute) it?
- Does the product/service address the market need? In what way? Does it solve a real problem?
- Do these capabilities already exist or will they have to be developed?
Deliverable: Gap analysis between what is currently available and what needs to be developed to align with market need and distribution realities.
4. Pricing
- How will you charge for your product/service? Per seat, per user, per transaction, per month?
- What are the scenarios and be sure to incorporate margin targets (you do want to make a profit after all).
- Include volume and contract duration discounts.
Deliverable: A pricing model that supports uptake scenarios and sensitivity analysis (test your assumptions and be prepared to have them informed/adjusted by reality). Test pricing and pricing assumptions during early customer validation discussions.
5. Go-to-market model
- Determine the best path to market including pros and cons of direct vs. indirect selling models.
- For indirect, understand what channels, available partners and how they distribute including sell through opportunities.
- What is the optimal go-to-market model to reach your target customer…and what is the forecasted cost of customer acquisition?
- Remember – you have to be able to sell it yourself before a distribution partner will be able to do it. Don't fall into the trap of thinking a partner will carry your product to market without you or without your help (a great deal of it at first).
Deliverable: Select an optimal go-to-market model to reach your target customer and detail how you will enable the model to be successful (what tools, techniques, dependencies, etc.)
6. User experience
- What does a "day in the life" look like for a target buyer or end-user?
- Map your product/service use cases against that day and define the gaps, pains, and workarounds currently being used.
- Write a narrative of this day. Use your persona and write a story that spans the start of their day to the end of it including all the tasks, systems, and steps they take during the day (this is hard…but very, very valuable).
Deliverable: Build a process flow of current state for your target user(s) and then one that shows how their daily activities would change for them and other key players by using your product or service.
This should get you started and provide a point of reference as you assess a market opportunity. Yes, there are many additional tasks and details but this (to me) represents the core elements to complete. What did I miss? What would you add?
The case for case interviews
I was asked a question today (via email) about case interviewing somewhat indirectly by someone going through the interview cycles with management consulting firms. I weighed in along with a couple of others on what they are all about and how to best approach them.
I have been on both the delivering and receiving end of these types of questions during my time with Arthur Andersen Business Consulting (now mostly part of Bearingpoint). Although we were not a tier 1 strategy firm like Mckinsey, Bain, etc. we did similar (albeit it cheaper) work and had many of the same approaches, methodologies, and operating models. Here are my two cents on how to best approach the case question. Feel free to weigh in in the comments about your own experiences:
- The answer is not as important as how you get there.
- Case
interview questions are an exercise in the employer understanding how
you think and you showing off how you can apply a structured framework
to solving a problem where you have minimal information.
Take this example (one from my vintage): How many plumbers are
there in the U.S.? The actual number is not important but
think about how you would calculate this:
- What information
sources would you use, professional associations, unions, publications,
blogs, etc. - How would you segment this population – professionals, handymen,
weekend warriors, etc. - How would you quantify the size and
growth of the population – demographics, trends like more building
requires new plumbing/less building requires more maintenance, is this a
different skill set or one that the same population can use regardless
of need? - And so on…
Consulting is all about taking
imperfect data inputs, structuring them in a salient way, and extracting
some meaningful and actionable insight then managing the process of
using that insight to change strategy, process, or systems.
Hands vs. Mind
I had a nice chat this week with someone I had met in the past and with whom I recently reconnected. We talked about a wide range of topics related to technology, marketing, and the types of work we do. I did not explicitly ask if I could reference him so in the spirit of "journalistic integrity" I will not but will definitely update the post when I get the green light.
One of the more interesting parts of our discussion was about doing "hands" work vs. "mind" work. Although it would be easy to separate this as tactics vs. strategy that is not so much the case. It is about being in the weeds to get something done like writing copy and delivering pitches to prospects, analysts, or journalists vs. spending cycles on what needs to be said, how to position the company, and who to target as a customer or influential all the while tracking performance and making tweaks.
The challenge, at least in a startup, is to focus on getting things done (hands) no matter what it is while keeping an eye on it through a strategic framework (mind). Although it is a bit of cliche, I never ask anyone on my team to do something that I haven't already done myself or wouldn't be willing to do. There is no time or cycles to spend on someone who deems tasks below them – this is radioactive in a startup so if you see it, address it immediately.
Given the speed, resource constraints, and workload in a startup, it is a definite challenge to balance these two types of work so think it about it as hands vs. mind and be sure to make time for both.

