Definition: Cookout

We are having a gathering here at the house tomorrow to celebrate (approximately) the little one's birthday.  As such, we are having a "cookout."  This is different than a barbeque as any Southerner knows that this is something you eat not an event you have. 

Here in the Northwest a cookout is a barbeque even if you are eating salmon.

All very confusing and the "cookout" invites have generated questions like "does that mean I bring my own food?", "is it a competition?," or even better "what is that?"

Even Wikipedia will lead you astray.  Instapundit Glenn Reynolds just made the same point.

Just trying to bring a little culture to the Northwest.

An early morning visit to Ballard

Paid a visit to Carter Saab over in Ballard yesterday to keep the car going strong.  They are a great crew there – better than any of the other Saab dealerships I've experienced in Seattle metro or Atlanta for that matter.  Needed a bit of scheduled work so after arriving for an early morning appointment (7am), headed over to Caffe Fiore based on John's recommendation to pass the time.  Cool place and nice people.

As I've previously pointed out, Ballard is a great area of Seattle that is steeped in a bit of Scandinavian history/culture.  If you visit this city, put it on the agenda and if you are looking for a new/used car, give the folks over at Carter a shot.

Hearing weak signals

Good post by Stu Phillips on internet noise and how many of the current approaches to "social networking" have increased "noise" but not "signal quality" and in many cases weak "signals" can't be heard above the noise. 

I think this gets at the heart of practical usage of all these platforms now available to connect and share with others.  We all have large numbers of contacts but only a handful (15-20) of highly frequent contacts, some larger number of contacts we interact with less frequently, and a significant number with no recent contact activity.  The challenge is to separate out low frequency contacts that you desire vs. those that are of passing or even no interest.

A must read

I continue to reflect on Steven Gary Blanks’ Four Steps to the Epiphany and have even gone so far as to give a copy to everyone on my team. 

I think it methodically and directly frames the essence of the challenges of building and launching technology products.  I also believe that most of the lessons can be extended beyond to tech to just about any go-to-market effort.  I marked a few pages as I read it the first time and wanted to share some of the things I thought were compelling. 

One of the recurring themes Blank lays out deals with how you are trying to enter a market and how your tasks and challenges vary based on the path you choose:

1. New product to an existing market
2. New product to new market
3. New product to existing market and trying to re-segment as low cost entrant
4. New product to existing market and trying to re-segment that market as a niche entrant

Also, core to the message is the notion of a “learning and discovery process.”  This is the sometimes uncomfortable and frustrating process of testing your hypothesis on the market and refining based on what you learn.  A customer engagement process vs. building something and tossing it into the market assuming it will be adopted….what a concept.

“Learning and discovering who a company’s initial customers will be, and what markets they are in, requires a separate and distinct process from Product Development”

I became aware of this book via Marc Andreessen’s post on it and it ties together nicely with his thoughts (and mine) on achieving product/market fit, the steps to get there, and knowing what it feels like once the market begins to “pull” your product or service.

Career choices of MBAs as negative indicators

Picked this up today citing a recent survey of MBAs where 1 out of 4 ranked Google their #1 target for a job.  Unfortunately, this may not be good news for the company.

There has been some research into how the career choices of MBA grads (Harvard in this case) are strong negative indicators for the stock market.  The logic being that by the time the horde has its sites on the big dough of Wall Street, the up cycle and good times have just about run their course.  Recent data was eerily predictive of the recent decline, volatility, and layoffs there.

Here is an interesting article from way back in 1994 on this.  Here's the HBS career stats if you care to do your own analysis.  The fella that came up with this is a former Brown Brothers Harriman exec named Ray Soifer. Check out his site and the "2007 Harvard MBA Stock Indicator."  Here's an article from the NY Sun on him.  Dealbreaker has covered it a couple times as well – here and here.

Think this applies outside of Wall Street?  Maybe the "free food" variable will counter this force…

Signed up for ClearContext Personal beta & more Xobni beta invites available

I signed up for this yesterday and hope to get my invite here shortly.  ClearContext is attacking the "email problem" and I look forward to comparing and contrasting with my Xobni experience.  Here's their blog.  Speaking of Xobni, I finally got back up and running after fixing my "Cached Exchange Mode" issue.

Xobni_warning
 

So, I am back on track as a Xobni user and have 10 beta invites if anyone is interested.  They really nailed the beta program process and I congratulate them on the continued buzz they are building out there.  Lots of pain in the inbox and email is something everyone loves to hate. 

We'll see if my MS Outlook client can handle another plug-in as I love to tinker with new tools as they become available.  I have a few plug-ins loaded plus a Salesforce.com plug-in that makes Outlook jump through some hoops as it starts and operates.  Makes you wonder if the path to fixing this problem is through MS Outlook as the more I seem to load into it, the grumpier it gets.

Anyway, I'll keep you posted as I get my ClearContext access.  Here's a nice video tour that they made available for distribution (nice touch!):

This is a really bad idea

Not the effort to defray the rising cost of fuel by charging passengers for checking a bag ($15) but American Airlines' applying it to those that aren't frequent flyers.  Why not just pass it through on the price of the ticket or apply it to those that can absorb more ridiculous fees?

So, why is this a bad idea?

I fly more than I care to (although admittedly not much on American) and it is increasingly clear to me that NO ONE enjoys it – the passengers, the crew, TSA…no one.  So now those that don't fly much have the incentive to bring even more crap onto the plane to try to shove in the overhead compartments.  This
new fee structure applies to those with no frequent flyer status that have purchased "discounted coach fare" tickets.  Fabulous.

For those of you that know me, I have a somewhat "controversial" no help policy for those that bring bags on planes they can't or have trouble lifting.  Why?  First and foremost, not my job and not part of my ticket price.  Secondly, having watched flight attendants handle this deftly over the years by advising but not physically helping passengers with bags, I decided to make it my policy as well.

Now before you brand me a jerk and question how my Southern upbringing could allow this to happen, I (use to) have a strong defense – there is a parallel process designed to help you with your bags called "check them."  Americans new policy may cause me to revist my policy as well as encourage me to want to board even earlier to find a slot for my very efficiently packed and very small carry on suitcase.

Happy thoughts on the US economy

Picked this uplifting nugget up via RealClearPolitics citing an article that appeared in the UK’s Telegraph on the state of the US economy and how the US consumer is handling it.

US consumers are juggling plastic to put off their day
of reckoning. The Fed survey said credit card debt had jumped 6.7pc in
the first quarter to $957bn, or $6,000 per working American, despite
usury rates near 20pc.

Now, how much of this is worst case scenario versus the true state of affairs is yet to be seen.  I believe we still have a bit of nastiness to work through before things improve in earnest.  But, when everybody is finally talking about how bad it is, isn’t that when it is actually getting better?